<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Chrs&#039; patch of t&#039;internets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chrs181818.com/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chrs181818.com/blog</link>
	<description>Blogtastic goodness about everything and anything.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 22:11:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stop! Philosophy Time! (D&#8217;Souza/Loftus) by Michelle</title>
		<link>http://chrs181818.com/blog/?p=20&#038;cpage=1#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 22:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrs181818.com/blog/?p=20#comment-26</guid>
		<description>I listened to the whole thing, which wasn&#039;t a total loss because, as you say, the video is boring so I managed to do other chores while listening. John Loftus didn&#039;t seem prepared to make any real pointls; all of his &quot;arguments&quot; seemed to boil down to ridicule and incredulity. On his own blog, Loftus said that Dinesh D&#039;Souza dismissed his opening statement, but that he now realizes that he never defended it. I really wish he had defended it, a real debate might have broken out instead of this mishmash of contempt and emotionalism. D&#039;Souza won this one easily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I listened to the whole thing, which wasn&#8217;t a total loss because, as you say, the video is boring so I managed to do other chores while listening. John Loftus didn&#8217;t seem prepared to make any real pointls; all of his &#8220;arguments&#8221; seemed to boil down to ridicule and incredulity. On his own blog, Loftus said that Dinesh D&#8217;Souza dismissed his opening statement, but that he now realizes that he never defended it. I really wish he had defended it, a real debate might have broken out instead of this mishmash of contempt and emotionalism. D&#8217;Souza won this one easily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
